Dynamic Generative Control

By

Chinese version: 动态生成式控制 - 知乎 (zhihu.com)

In several previous blog posts, we formulated the control problem as a generative model in the following fashion:

\[[v,w,x] = g(z), \quad z \sim \mathbb{D},\]

in which \(v\) is the collection of control objecties to be minimized, \(w\) contains the output control signals, and \(x\) represents the input signals that are thought to offer information to the control problem.

When the system is dynamic, the form above lacks the explicit modeling of dynamic changes. The simplest form of a dynamic generative control model can be written as

\[\begin{bmatrix} v_t & w_t & x_t \\ v_{t-1} & w_{t-1} & x_{t-1} \end{bmatrix} = g(z), \quad z \sim \mathbb{D}.\]

Now, \(g(z)\) is able to generate system states before and after a control step, therefore after training, it must be able to model the dynamic changes in the controlled system. The effect of this is a simpler dynamic control algorithm than that of a static model:

\[ \begin{align} & \text{Initialize } [v_0, x_0] = r (u_0, w_0) \\ & \text{for } t = 1 \text{ to } \infty \text{ do} \\ & \quad \text{Initialize } [v', w', x'] = [v_{t-1}, w_{t-1}, x_{t-1}] \\ & \quad \text{for } N \text{ steps} \text{ do} \\ & \quad \quad z' = \underset{z}{\text{argmin}} \left\| g(z) - \begin{bmatrix} v' - \epsilon & w' & x' \\ v_{t-1} & w_{t-1} & x_{t-1} \end{bmatrix} \right\| \\ & \quad \quad \begin{bmatrix} v' & w' & x' \\ \_ & \_ & \_ \end{bmatrix} = g(z') \\ & \quad w_t = w' \\ & \quad [v_t, x_t] = r (u_t, w_t) \end{align} \]

Similarly to before, this algorithm proceeds by attempting to minimize the control objectives \(v\) until it has achieved the equilibrium. The difference is not needing to tune the step size of objectives \(\epsilon\), because the variables of step \(t\) is anchored by those at step \(t-1\). As long as \(g\) has been trained properly to model the system transitions, it should be able to find the control parameters that can maximally minimize the objectives in \(v\).

Without a doubt, the inner loop of the algorithm disambiguiated the uncertainty between all variables just like discussed before, making it possible to amortize the algorithm at each control step. This will reduce the model much more agressively to the computation level of an MCU rather than a CPU / GPU / NPU, making it very cheap to use generative control compared to alternatives such as LLMs. See here for a good mathematical tutorial on amortization, and here for a philosophical discussion.

Furthermore, let \(x = [v_{t-1}, w_{t-1}, x_{t-1}, x_t]\), the formulation above is equivalent to the static model \([v,w,x] = g(z)\) and the dynamic algorithm above is equivalent to the static algorithm. This also matches with our previous discussion that the more we can provide useful signals to \(x\), the more powerful our generative world model can be. This equivalence is left to the readers to explicitly write out.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Serving Llama-2 7B using llama.cpp with NVIDIA CUDA on Ubuntu 22.04

By
This blog post is a step-by-step guide for running Llama-2 7B model using llama.cpp, with NVIDIA CUDA and Ubuntu 22.04.  llama.cpp is an C/C++ library for the inference of Llama/Llama-2 models. It has grown insanely popular along with the booming of large language model applications. Throughout this guide, we assume the user home directory (usually /home/username) is the working directory. Install NVIDIA CUDA To start, let's install NVIDIA CUDA on Ubuntu 22.04. The guide presented here is the same as the CUDA Toolkit download page provided by NVIDIA, but I deviate a little bit by installing CUDA 11.8 instead of the latest version. At the time of writing, PyTorch 2.0 stable is released for CUDA 11.8 and I find it convenient to keep my deployed CUDA version in sync with that. $ wget https://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/repos/ubuntu2204/x86_64/cuda-keyring_1.1-1_all.deb $ sudo dpkg -i cuda-keyring_1.1-1_all.deb $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt install cuda-11-8 After ...
Read more

A Perplexity Benchmark of llama.cpp

By
Without further ado, here are the results (explanations and discussions later): Table 1: Perplexity on wikitext-2 test set.   Model \ Quantization q4_0 q4_1 q5_0 q5_1 q8_0 fp16 llama-7b 6.157 6.0915 5.9846 5.948 5.9063 5.68 llama-13b 5.385 5.3608 5.285 5.2702 5.2547 5.09 llama-30b 4.2707 - - - - 4.1 alpaca-30b 4.4521 - - - - - llama-2-7b 5.9675 6.0398 5.8328 5.8435 5.7897 - llama-2-7b-chat 7.7641 7.7853 7.5055 7.5392 7.5014 - llama-2-13b 5.2172 5.2115 5.1343 5.1289 5.1005 - llama-2-13b-chat ...
Read more

A Peek into Generative Control

By
Chinese version:  一窥生成式控制论 - 知乎 (zhihu.com) As a peek into some of my most recent work in applying generative modeling into various industries, I'm proudly presenting an idea that illustrates how powerful generative models can be for industrial controling. My team and I are working to rapidly expand this idea into many different areas, and we still haven't seen its limit yet. A General Formulation of Generative Models \[y = g(z), \quad z \sim \mathbb{D}\] where \(y\) is a sample from data, \(g\) is a generator neural network written as a function, and \(z\) follows a pre-defined distribution \(\mathbb{D}\). It is easy to identify that generative adversarial networks (GANs) naturally result in models in the above fashion. For autoregressive language models (transformers or otherwise), \(z\) is the concatenation of all the random sampling variables used during the decoding process. For stable diffusion, \(z\) is the concatenation of all the noise added in the diffusion process. A...
Read more